The 12 Best Book Covers of June
Images Within Images
Another month of books, another month of book covers. June was full of winks, nods, and interesting framings—here are my favorites, but as ever, feel free to add on to my list in the comments below:
It’s the look on the girl’s face, it’s the bluntness of the title by her head, it’s the chickens (obviously), it’s the way she becomes a paper doll as your eyes pass over the image, it’s the shadow, it’s the marigold.
No book cover designer makes me laugh quite as often as Oliver Munday. This is so weird and smart and silly at the same time.
Simple and compelling. The saturated black is doing a lot of work here.
You can see that this was designed by John Gall from a mile away; his beautiful eccentricities and Erpenbeck’s match perfectly.
This one gets weirder the longer you look at it, which is a plus in my book; it also doesn’t look like most covers these days, which also works in its favor.
Another funny cover—and another perfectly simple one too.
The layered framing is so compelling here—as is the central, ominous flower in black and white, which I have to keep reminding myself is not an insect.
Just brilliant (and cheeky) interplay of text and image at every opportunity.
I would like to lick this book cover (by Lit Hub editor Jessie Gaynor), even though I am pretty sure I shouldn’t. The dewy glow is perfectly captured and cropped, but it’s really the iridescent drip for me!
I’ve never seen a cut-out treatment quite like this before.
All about the image here.
“I hope you all like this cover as much as I do, that green is so good to me—I always try to buy clothes that are this color, honestly, and against the lettering in that style, I find myself wanting to have the book around and to hold it,” Emerson Whitney told Lit Hub. “Also, I was obsessed with images of tornadoes when I was a kid and so this rendering, in the form of a photograph, really exemplifies that craving I’ve always had and have written about here, it’s hinting at themes of adventuring, of image-making, and the complexity of ‘capturing.’” I must agree on the green.