• The Hub

    News, Notes, Talk

    Our terrible year of open letters continues: JK Rowling edition.

    Jonny Diamond

    September 30, 2020, 10:59am

    Pandemic? Depression? The rapid destabilization of one of the richest countries in the world? No, 2020 will likely go down in history as the year we had way too many open letters. Today sees an open letter in response to the open letter two days ago which was in response to the response that JK Rowling had been receiving on Twitter about her new novel. So.

    Article continues after advertisement
    Remove Ads

    This past Sunday the Times of London published an open letter signed by writers like Ian McEwan, Tom Stoppard, and Lionel Shriver (along with raging dickhead Graham Linehan and 54 others) decrying “an insidious, authoritarian and misogynistic trend in social media.” It’s an odd letter, though, as it’s less an explicit defense of Rowling, who continues to double-down on her transphobic way of seeing the world, and more an exasperated summary of how terrible social media is—which no one is really disagreeing with. (Ironically, this open letter is behind a paywall.)

    In response to this open letter, The Second Shelf—a London bookshop specializing in rare and vintage books by and about women and non-binary people—just published an open letter signed by 200 writers and publishers, declaring that:

    Culture is, and should always be, at the forefront of societal change, and as writers, editors, agents, journalists, and publishing professionals, we recognise the vital role our industry has in advancing and supporting the wellbeing and rights of trans and non-binary people.

    That sounds about right. Among the signatories of this declaration (it is mercifully short), are such Lit Hub favorites as Jeannette Winterson, Max Porter, Daisy Johnson, Naoise Dolan, Guy Gunaratne, Olivia Sudjic, Sinead Gleeson, A.N. Devers (owner of The Second Shelf), and many more.

    Article continues after advertisement
    Remove Ads

    Frankly, it’s very hard to see the point of open letters in the era of Facebook and Twitter when, daily, we express solidarity and disagreement with dozens of half-formed opinions via our likes and our retweets; we are constantly signing our names—along with millions of others—to the endless stream of portentous declarations that constitute the digital public square. It’s exhausting, but it’s how we stumble toward in-group consensus.

    I get it, though (I’ve been guilty myself!). Up until the point Mark Zuckerberg finally got horny in college, the open letter made a lot of sense… Just look at the Magna Carta! The Declaration of Independence! Martin Luther King’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”! But after 2020—and its most famous/infamous open letter—I truly hope the concept itself goes the way of the handshake: a weird memory of a different time.

  • Become a Lit Hub Supporting Member: Because Books Matter

    For the past decade, Literary Hub has brought you the best of the book world for free—no paywall. But our future relies on you. In return for a donation, you’ll get an ad-free reading experience, exclusive editors’ picks, book giveaways, and our coveted Joan Didion Lit Hub tote bag. Most importantly, you’ll keep independent book coverage alive and thriving on the internet.

    x