• The Hub

    News, Notes, Talk

    Grab your tickets for Freedom to Write for Palestine.

    Dan Sheehan

    May 2, 2024, 12:57pm

    If you’re in New York City next Tuesday, May 7, why not head on over to Judson Memorial Church on Washington Square, where more than two dozen writers and musicians will be performing their work to raise money for We Are Not Numbers, a youth-led Palestinian nonprofit project in Gaza that provides the world with direct access to Palestinian narratives.

    Freedom to Write for Palestine

    Freedom to Write for Palestinewhich is being organized by Palestine Festival of Literature, Writers Against the War on Gaza, and Amplify Palestinewill feature writers (including Michelle Alexander, Hari Kunzru, Marie Myung-Ok Lee, and Parul Sehgal) who withdrew from PEN America’s (recently canceled) World Voices Festival and Literary Awards due to the organization’s response to Israel’s war on Gaza.

    It promises to be a memorable evening of story, song, and solidarity in aid of a very worthy cause. Space, however, is limited and tickets appear to be selling fast, so grab yours here before they sell out.

     

    ​​​​If you are an author who has withdrawn from the World Voices Festival, the organizers of Freedom to Write for Palestine encourage you to join them on May 7.
    Email info@palfest.org.

    10 of the best author-turned-artists, ranked.

    Brittany Allen

    May 2, 2024, 11:03am

    In an essay on the painter Walter Sickert, Virginia Woolf once voiced a surprising preference: “Words are an impure medium; better far to have been born into the silent kingdom of paint.” This turned out to be a running theme. In 2021, David Zwirner put out a collection of her art writing with the wistful title, Oh, To Be a Painter!

    Though perhaps “paint > words,” is a surprising sentiment to hear from one of the twentieth century’s greatest authors, Woolf is far from the only writer in thrall to the visual arts. There’s a long list of novels featuring painter protagonists. And in some cases (see: Dorian Gray) a piece of art propels a plot. Less remarked on is the writer-turned-visual-artist phenomenon, presumably born of authors like Woolf who held a candle for the canvas. Or, more than a candle. Yes: here’s the part where I invite you to consider the writer who picks up the brush, pen, or scissors… herself.

    Polymathing is a difficult row to hoe, so I take a moment to marvel first at all the artists who work across mediums. Butand at the risk of being gauchewhile looking into the hybrid creator, I was curious to see who wore their second hat….the best. So here is a ranked list of art works by mostly-known-as-authors. (Givens, to get them out of the way: obviously, art is subjective, and I am no Jerry Saltz.)

    10.
    Alexander Pushkin 

    The beloved Russian novelist Alexander Pushkin was a quintuple-threat. The man wrote books, plays, poems, and music. Biographers also recently discovered that he kept a graphic journal, stuffed with doodles and sketches.

    Like this one of of his lover, Anna Alexevyena Olenina.

    Though Pushkin never pursued drawing professionallyperhaps he was too busy, between the other four careers—you can see the aptitude here. There’s a clear personality, coming through in the bold line work of his sketches. So I would like to give this busy genius a solid participation trophy, in my imaginary contest.

    9.
    Flannery O’Connor

    The fact that the grand dame of the Southern Gothic moonlit as a cartoonist is fairly well-documented. O’Connor spoke often about her drawing practice, which she saw as part of “the habit of art.”

    The satirical cartoon series she drew about the women of WAVE (or, Women Appointed for Voluntary Emergency Service) has been the subject of particular fascination. Find one of those panels, below.

    I enjoy the snouts! The shoulders! There’s something of Harold Gray’s “Annie” in these woodblock-y curves. But what strikes me the most about this series is the playful sense of humor. Though ever-wry, I don’t tend to think of the lady as a goofball on the page.

    Counterpoint: the composition does leave a little to be desired. O’Connor’s aperture on the sketchpad doesn’t feel as tight as it does in, say, “Country People.”

    8.
    William Makepeace Thackeray

    The Victorian wit is one of the few folks on this list who was well-known as a visual artist in his lifetime. Thackers did not hide his second love under a bushel. In fact, many of his pieces accompanied an illustrated printing of his novel, Vanity Fair.

    In 1875, the art collector Joseph Grego gathered hundreds of Thackeray’s illustrations and published them in a ridiculously named compendium. Here’s a sample from those files, via The Victorian Web.

    Really fun line work, in this “reviewer’s” opinion. But this one’s maybe a little staid, a little claggy. Some of the work seems stranded between caricature and earnest representation.

    7.
    Franz Kafka

    In his own estimation, Kafka was “once a great draftsman,” in addition to being an epoch-defining story writer. His sketches were recently collected in a book, Franz Kafka: The Drawings, which was excerpted in these very pages.

    This drawing, from the literary estate of Max Brod, caught my eye.

    Kafka’s jagged angles lend themselves to interesting compositions.  Which rhymes with his general vibe, in the short fiction. And I’m not sure if I’ve ever seen the anguish of the writing process represented better.

    The lines are confident, elegant, dynamic—if a little hasty-feeling. I think the clerk could have been a contender!

    6.
    Victor Hugo

    It’s unclear to me how Victor Hugo had time to draw, given the sheer amount of print matter he produced over his reign as the big literary tuna in 19th century France. But somewhere in between writing to two thousand-plus-page opuses (opi?), and many plays, novellas, and short stories, Hugo honed a real talent for drawing. His son Charles described his work as “often strange, always personal,” and reminiscent of “the etchings of Rembrandt and Piranesi.”

    Hugo’s drawnings were collected in a book, Shadows of a Hand: The Drawings of Victor Hugo. Here’s a favorite from those pages.

    I get sucked into this strange octopus. It’s so compelling! Dark, vivid, and textured. Just like large sections of Les Misérables. 

    5.
    Sylvia Plath

    The poet Sylvia Plath actually set out to become an artist. She was an art major at Smith College, and made self-portraits, drawings, and collages throughout her life.

    In 2018, the National Portrait Gallery dedicated an exhibit to her early work. This collage of Eisenhower (among other things) is liveliest to me.

    Plath’s work is generally exuberant, if sometimes eerie. She seems to be just as interested in the uncanny at the easel as she is at the desk. But her work often features text, which feels a little like cheating, for the purposes of this very scientific exercise.

    4.
    Lorraine Hansberry

    This brilliant playwright also studied drawing and painting before she ever applied her wicked wit to a typewriter. While a student at the University of Wisconsin, Hansberry produced several black and white illustrations, and self portraits running the gamut from cheeky, playful doodles to dramatic etchings.

    Here’s her “Three Men,via the Lorraine Hansberry Literary Trust.

    I’m pretty dazzled by the shadows and shapes in this one, whose subject’s brows remind me of the famous Jean-Paule Goude print of Grace Jones. Yet another reason to mourn the early loss of this monumental talent.

    3.
    Tennessee Williams 

    Oh, Tennessee. You luminous, dramatic soul. A 2015 show at the Ogden Museum in New Orleans celebrated the Southern dramatist’s second calling.

    For my money, Williams’ playful paletteas in 1976’s “Cri de Coeur,” seen aboveis almost as exciting, zany, and heartbreaking as the best of his writing. And attention must be paid to this cheerful portrait of the actor Michael York.

    2.
    Federico García Lorca

    Poet and playwright Federico García Lorca was also an artist by trade. He worked in lithographs, mixed media, and good old fashioned pen and ink. I gravitate towards the drawings, which have a surrealist edge. As in 1927’s “Dama en el balcón,” pictured here.

    I appreciate the subject’s whimsical tilted head, and the curious costuming. But mostly I’m drawn to the vibe creeping around the edges of his shapes. You can see where Lorca’s friendships with Luis Buñuel and Salvador Dalí left fingerprints.

    1.
    Rabindranath Tagore 

    A philosopher, a painter, and a Nobel Prize-winning poet, Tagore was a true Renaissance figure. His moody, often large-scale portraits tended to depict haunted faces in extreme close up. Like this 1940 piece, “Piyali,” care of Sotheby’s.

    I kind of can’t stop looking at this moody, layered, mask. It creeps and compels. It sticks to the skin, like the best poetry. So Tagore is the winner.

    These visionaries make a case for the visual author, a trend that continues. In a recent Washington Post piece, the novelist Nicholson Baker described a lately-found “hankering” for painting. The novelist Raven Leilani has spoken about how her painting practice informs her work. And the author/academic/painter Nell Irvin Painter(!) has a new hybrid collection out (I Just Keep Talking: A Life in Essays) in which she investigates her own twin streams of creativity. So there’s certainly something durable to this idea of “the habit of art.”

    Perhaps it’s best to judge an artist’s body of work, no matter the medium, as one continuous project. As Woolf said in her Sickert piece, “Undoubtedly the arts are closely united…Nowadays we have specialized to such an extent that critics neither hear music nor see color in literature; meaning is isolated; which accounts for the miserable state of criticism in our time and the partial manner in which it deals with its subject.”

    Well-worded, Virginia. Maybe we should all be painters.

    Cover image, via Smithsonian, “Triple-Face Portrait,” by Sylvia Plath.

    One great short story to read today:
    Donald Barthelme’s “The School”

    Emily Temple

    May 2, 2024, 10:30am

    According to the powers that be (er, apparently according to Dan Wickett of the Emerging Writers Network), May is Short Story Month. To celebrate, for the second year in a row, the Literary Hub staff will be recommending a single short story, free* to read online, every (work) day of the month. Why not read along with us? Today, we recommend:

    “The School,” by Donald Barthleme

    It’s no secret that I love this story. Every time I return to it, I do so with a little edge of trepidation, in case it has somehow degraded in my time away from it (or maybe I would have been the one to be somehow degraded). Any reading experience being, in general, inseparable from time and place, and the person you were when you were holding the book—but in particular, I have been warned that I would “grow out” of Barthleme. Nah. “The School,” originally published in The New Yorker in 1974, never lets me down: it is the escalation story that all other escalation stories look up to; it is elegant and funny and, at just over 1,200 words, exactly as long as it needs to be to deliver its stupidly effective gut-punch. (Trust Barthelme to land the kinds of lines that shouldn’t be landable.) Well, perhaps I am stunted. Oh well—

    The story begins:

    Well, we had all these children out planting trees, see, because we figured that . . . that was part of their education, to see how, you know, the root systems . . . and also the sense of responsibility, taking care of things, being individually responsible. You know what I mean. And the trees all died. They were orange trees. I don’t know why they died, they just died. Something wrong with the soil possibly or maybe the stuff we got from the nursery wasn’t the best. We complained about it. So we’ve got thirty kids there, each kid had his or her own little tree to plant and we’ve got these thirty dead trees. All these kids looking at these little brown sticks, it was depressing.

    Read it here.

    *If you hit a paywall, we recommend trying with a different/private/incognito browser (but listen, you didn’t hear it from us).

    “Crazy with the poison of Vietnam in my lungs.” Paul Auster on the ’68 Columbia protests.

    James Folta

    May 1, 2024, 1:18pm

    Auster second from the right, in a photo by Jerry Upham
    from the collection of Paul Cronin and re-printed in
    Vanity Fair

    As police, administrators, politicians, and outsiders attack college protesters in a wave of reactionary repression, I am reminded of the role the recently-passed novelist Paul Auster played in the anti-Vietnam War protests at Columbia University.

    Auster’s participation is briefly documented in a Vanity Fair oral history of the ’68 campus takeover, and he appears in photos and film from the uprising. Auster also recounted his experience in a 2008 op-ed for The New York Times on the fortieth anniversary of the day students first occupied the Columbia campus.

    “The Accidental Rebel” recounts how “a quiet, bookish young man,” who had protested against the Vietnam War but “was not an active member of any political organization on campus,” found himself inspired to join in protest with his fellow students in April 1968:

    I went because I was crazy, crazy with the poison of Vietnam in my lungs, and the many hundreds of students who gathered around the sundial in the center of campus that afternoon were not there to protest the construction of the gym so much as to vent their craziness, to lash out at something, anything, and since we were all students at Columbia, why not throw bricks at Columbia, since it was engaged in lucrative research projects for military contractors and thus was contributing to the war effort in Vietnam?

    Auster was part of the group that briefly shut down construction on a new gym (a major goal for Black student protesters, who sought to resist Columbia’s further expansion into Harlem), and then moved to take control of buildings on campus later that day. Auster was in Mathematics Hall for the weeklong campus occupation.

    When the administration called in the police, Auster was among the students arrested by the NYPD: “I was arrested & pulled by my hair to the police van by one officer as another officer stomped on my hand with his boot,” he writes. Then, as today, reactionaries like the police resorted to brutality and violence in response to student demands and protests.

    In his 2008 op-ed, Auster explicitly resisted drawing a parallel between his story and the then-current protest movement against the Iraq War. Still, it’s hard to read Auster’s account of how a budding author became a part of history and not hear it rhyme with today.

    How many generations of students have been told that they are the future and are offered an open hand to go forth and change the world? And how many generations have instead found their attempts to change the world met with a closed fist?

    The 1968 Columbia occupation is now seen as an historic moment in the American anti-war movement, and Auster was proud to count himself as a participant. But he also concluded that the protest at Columbia wasn’t substantial enough—the student actions that day were merely “symbolic” but “not empty gestures.”

    Auster’s contemporaries disagreed, and wrote to The Times to correct his assessment:

    …I must respectfully disagree with his assertion that the 1968 protests at Columbia University accomplished ‘not much of anything.’

    The Vietnam War would have continued much longer than seven years without the tidal wave of antiwar sentiment to which the Morningside Park protest contributed enormous energy and momentum. Would that we could accomplish as much today.

    One great short story to read today:
    Ling Ma’s “Office Hours”

    Emily Temple

    May 1, 2024, 10:30am

    According to the powers that be (er, apparently according to Dan Wickett of the Emerging Writers Network), May is Short Story Month. To celebrate, for the second year in a row, the Literary Hub staff will be recommending a single short story, free* to read online, every (work) day of the month. Why not read along with us? Today, we recommend:

    “Office Hours” by Ling Ma

    I don’t want to say too much about this story, because its first hinge is one of surprise, an expectation not just subverted but reinvented. This is not uncommon for Ma, who loves to skirt the edges of reality, and invite the dream into the everyday. It’s the second hinge, though, the one that happens on the other side of the rabbit hole (so to speak), that makes this story stick in the mind long after reading.

    The story begins:

    How she used to smoke in his office, back when the University allowed that in campus buildings. He didn’t smoke, but allowed her to as she sat on the sofa across from his desk. Or rather, he didn’t object, and even set out a little dessert plate as an ashtray. Maybe because it gave them both a pretense for talking longer, for the extra duration of a cigarette, then two, then three. So that by the time she graduated, she was a chain-smoker.

    Read it here.

    *If you hit a paywall, we recommend trying with a different/private/incognito browser (but listen, you didn’t hear it from us).

  • Become a Lit Hub Supporting Member: Because Books Matter

    For the past decade, Literary Hub has brought you the best of the book world for free—no paywall. But our future relies on you. In return for a donation, you’ll get an ad-free reading experience, exclusive editors’ picks, book giveaways, and our coveted Joan Didion Lit Hub tote bag. Most importantly, you’ll keep independent book coverage alive and thriving on the internet.

    x