Positive
Jason Rezaian,
The Washington Post
... Joel Simon expertly explains... there is no consensus about how to respond to an ancient practice that has made a terrible resurgence in the post-9/11 era.
Positive
Ann Toews,
The Wall Street Journal
Despite having a stake in the safety of journalists, Mr. Simon takes a strategic tack in We Want to Negotiate, a series of profiles and case studies that finds equal fault with shows of vulnerability in France—where the French media regularly show the president greeting each returning French hostage—and an unyielding posture in America, which terrorist recruiters exploit to make U.S. officials seem callous. Mr. Simon’s experience and extensive interviews...have convinced him that governments—the no-concessions purists and the consistent ransom-payers alike—should veil their intentions, buying time to assess each case’s distinct national-security impact and improving the chances that the hostage is treated well by captors.
Positive
Edwin Burgess,
Library Journal
This readable and well-argued book is essential for ethics, journalism, and international relations collections, and a valuable rubric for assessing hostage policy, whether by governments, individuals, or businesses..
Positive
Kirkus
A well-formed argument against the doctrine of refusing to negotiate with terrorists to gain the release of hostages.
Positive
Publishers Weekly
This concise, well-reasoned treatise takes as its central question whether governments should make concessions—in particular, ransom payments—when dealing with political kidnappings.